Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of Steve Earle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles 00:32, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of Steve Earle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources outside a terse review from Allmusic. Fails notability for albums. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 17:15, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appears to pass WP:NALBUMS "In general, if the musician or ensemble is notable, and if the album in question has been mentioned in multiple reliable sources, then their officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." A quick google search brings up this review http://www.popmatters.com/pm/review/earlesteve-bestof20th -- this review has to be one of the most interesting I've read in a long time and probably should be incorporated into the album's article. Overall I feel that this article should be improved, not deleted. Punkrocker1991 (talk) 09:40, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Punkrocker1991. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:43, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Punkrocker and per WP:OSE. It's bad practice, and contrary to the encyclopedic nature of this project, to arbitrarily punch holes in otherwise complete discographies. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.