Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Queens stabbing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Queens stabbing[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS; WP:RECENT; WP:SUSTAINED. JM (talk) 00:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This seems rather unremarkable, as such events go. BD2412 T 00:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and New York. Shellwood (talk) 00:42, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: routine crime event in New York City, covered by routine reporting. Nothing indicating it was in anyway more notable than any other crime in the city. Oaktree b (talk) 00:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now, I think it's too soon to say whether or not this is notable yet. Calicodragon (talk) 06:38, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If it's too soon to even know if it's notable, then it's too soon to have an article. JM (talk) 07:45, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Routine crime. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:01, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. There is no indication of this crime having sustained notability.

Moshe1022 (talk) 11:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Per nom, and, I'd also like to draw upon conventional news style ethical practices – it's too soon. It's feasible affected parties may not know and may find out, via the inclusion of specific ages of those deceased, who the family is. Jondvdsn1 (talk) 12:28, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:NEVENT and WP:NCRIME, mainly for WP:EFFECT, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:PERSISTENCE, WP:DEPTH and WP:GEOSCOPE. And, of course, as JM2023 sums up perfectly, WP:TOOSOON to know notability is too soon for an article. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 14:53, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As much as this is tragic, this fails WP:NCRIME at the moment and may also go against WP:NOTNEWS. I do think this article can be recreated later if it does turn out to be notable. At the moment, it's too soon to tell whether this was a domestic violence incident or something else, but the sources seem to describe it as an intra-family dispute, which isn't inherently notable. – Epicgenius (talk) 15:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 16:33, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Stabbings of less than 10 are usual in big cities. ✶Mitch199811✶ 18:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- What a truly tragic comment on the state of America today! -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per 2023 Paris attack. Both have coverage, but this one has multiple victims. We shouldn't be biased. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You can nominate that one for deletion if you want. I don't think "we have this so why shouldn't we have this" is a good argument when we can instead look at policies and guidelines like the 9 people who !voted Delete. JM (talk) 05:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.