Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 in association football
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 19:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2021 in association football (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article consists mostly of gazing into a crystal ball into a sea of red. This is not really a useful guide to future articles on association football. It was already draftified once and moved back to article space anyway.
No objection to draftifying again, provided it stays in draft space until it has more substance, but moving it back to draft space unilaterally would be move-warring. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 20:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - for a topic of this nature, so soon, WP:CRYSTAL does not apply. GiantSnowman 21:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We've had these articles going back years, why are you nominating this one? They always have good cited sources for WP:GNG so this nomination is just stupid. Govvy (talk) 17:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per above. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 20:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason given to delete. There is no possible to eliminate the article, then recreate it in a few months from now. Just let it be. Dream Focus 14:24, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.