Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021–22 ÖFB-Frauenliga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 10:31, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2021–22 ÖFB-Frauenliga

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another contested redirect without a single in-depth source. While there are mentions of the team, obviously, there is no in-depth coverage of the season. Would have draftified, but that's no longer an option. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:09, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Football, and Austria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:11, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - plenty of sources out there, see this and this and this. Top women's league in Austria, looks to be notable. Giant Snowman 12:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG. Article and BEFORE showed nothing with IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.

Source eval for above:

Game schedule, not IS RS with SIGCOV :: https://www.oefb.at/oefb/Ligen-Bewerbe/Frauen/Planet-Pure-Frauen-Bundesliga
Stats page, not IS RS with SIGCOV :: https://www.kicker.de/oefb-frauen-bundesliga/spieltag
Stats page, not IS RS with SIGCOV :: https://sport.orf.at/tabellen/stories/2288303

Stat pages and game schedules do not show notability. None of the above is IS RS with SIGCOV. // Timothy :: talk 14:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per GiantSnowman. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 16:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It is better to leave it, as this article is very relevant, Владлен-товарищ (talk) 11:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per GiantSnowman.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per above. Kante4 (talk) 10:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: None of the WP:PERX comments address Timothy's analysis of the sources or provide any additional sources, more discussion seems warranted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aoidh (talk) 03:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Per above & topic is relevant enough PalauanReich (talk) 23:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: First relisting comment is still relevant.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - top national league. BEFORE failure as there are sources out there - in the last few days there's been sources from the current season - so I don't know why there'd be any doubt about the previous season - 1, 2. Also the nominator - User:onel5969 - seems to think this is a team. It's not only a league, it's the top league in Austria! Can Onel5969 expand on the "team", or withdraw this nomination? Nfitz (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 16:35, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per source analysis by Timothy. The league is notable (and already has its own article), but that is not inherited by this season in particular. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.