Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 United States Air Force F-15 crash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Academic Challenger (talk) 21:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 United States Air Force F-15 crash[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tragic but military training accidents are very common and therefore rarely notable. WP:NOTNEWS also applies. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I concur with wiliam. Military accidents are non-notable in themselves, unless notable for other reasons, like:- notable passengers, notable crew, casualties on the ground, mid-air with civilian aircraft. Anything where the notability is gained from something other than the crash itself. Just another pile of scrap in RAF Dogger Bank, is definitely not notable.--Petebutt (talk) 20:19, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:AIRCRASH. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:38, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Apologies, I created the article to soon, violating WP:RECENTISM and of course WP:AIRCRASH. (Regarding the latter) I'm not familiar with the WikiProject and I didn't see the page linked on WP:N...
Once again, apologies for the inconvinience - it was my mistake to create it. Giraffer (munch) 20:58, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Colleagues above are citing WP:AIRCRASH as a grounds for deletion. It says: "Because this is an essay and not policy and also because it should not be applied to stand-alone accident articles, it is recommended that it not be cited at Articles for Deletion discussions for either keeping or deleting. ". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTNEWS, military planes crash frequently, nothing to indicate anything notable about this crash. Mztourist (talk) 03:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability. USAF planes crash a lot, each of them doesn't need an article of its own Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 10:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fighter jets crash all the time. Vici Vidi (talk) 05:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. --Lockley (talk) 11:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.