Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020–21 Macclesfield Town F.C. season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can always be recreated if sufficient coverage is found once the season is actually underway. Fenix down (talk) 06:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020–21 Macclesfield Town F.C. season

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSEASONS following Macclesfield's relegation - BBC Sport Microwave Anarchist (talk) 18:54, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - given the nature of their relegation I think there is/will be sufficient coverage. The article would be deemed notable had a panel made a different decision. Giant Snowman 11:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NSEASONS still applies for the National league, non-league football season. Govvy (talk) 11:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Govvy Spiderone 13:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NSEASONS failure. Number 5 7 19:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete yeah because of the EFL fucking them over they fail now and it should be deleted.Muur (talk) 00:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.