Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 in British music charts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. postdlf (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 in British music charts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD, rationale was to take to AfD anyhow. Very much a undersourced article with one source acting as priamary source. Verging on NOTNEWS as to be honest it isn't as notable as the Worldwide music charts. If the individual singles were notable and have their own article, wouldn't a category suffice? Nördic Nightfury 19:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Nördic Nightfury 19:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Nördic Nightfury 19:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:16, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 03:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Some of this is really excessively trivial (I don't think we need a week by week description, just a description of the more important events in the year), but the information on number ones etc is valid and probably too long to merge (and going to get longer). --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.