Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Western Force season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Western Force season[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article contains no information that is not already available in 2017 Super Rugby season or Western Force. It's also missing a lead section, citations and one column (i.e. one half of the article) is dedicated to previous seasons, which is off-topic. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 00:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Western Force, if any information isn't there already, otherwise delete. As nom has said, this information should be included in the main article on the team. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 16:34, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, m.o.p 20:29, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:55, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:55, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This information is already appropriately included elsewhere. No need to duplicate it. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no need to include when included elsewhere. LibStar (talk) 06:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.