Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Queensland Reds season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Queensland Reds. Consensus is obviously to not keep the article. As it is a plausible search term I think it's useful to maintain as a redirect, and as a bonus the content remains in the history just in case anyone wants to merge any of what was there. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:52, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Queensland Reds season[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article contains no information that is not already available in 2017 Super Rugby season or Queensland Reds. It's also missing a lead section, citations and one column (i.e. one half of the article) is dedicated to previous seasons, which is off-topic. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 00:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Queensland Reds, if any information isn't there already, as nom has said, this information should be included in the main article on the team. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment needing improvement is not a reason to nominate for deletion (It's also missing a lead section, citations and one column (i.e. one half of the article) is dedicated to previous seasons, which is off-topic. ). Mjroots (talk) 16:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there are two previous seasons as per: Category:Queensland Reds seasons. Shall we either suggest these too are work in progress or are excessive and can be covered in other articles? Ajf773 (talk) 16:09, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ajf773:, the 2008 Queensland Reds season article also doesn't contain any information not available in 2008 Super 14 season, so I would support adding that one as well. The 2009 Queensland Reds season article should be retained in my opinion, since it contains content such as squad information, player changes and scorers. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 22:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Depends As is delete. Keep the other two articles. If this article can be brought to the same level as the other two then keep, a non trivial amount of work is required by an "expert" to do so. Otherwise it is a waste of reading time and should be deleted - TNT. Aoziwe (talk) 23:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. No sourced content so there is nothing worth merging. I'd probably say delete with no prejudice against recreation should someone actually make an attempt to create a halfway decent article. Jenks24 (talk) 03:52, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.