Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 League of Legends World Championship rosters

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:55, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 League of Legends World Championship rosters[edit]

2017 League of Legends World Championship rosters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTSTATSBOOK. This is linked to from 2017 League of Legends World Championship, but if it is unnecessary detail that would clutter up that article it certainly doesn't warrant its own article. Pontificalibus (talk) 11:08, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:27, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:27, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. If readers want to know this, they should go to the LoL website. Sergecross73 msg me 12:02, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete per nom. This is not what Wikipedia is for. Ajf773 (talk) 12:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 12:24, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just have to giggle at how we have literal thousands of pages dedicated to specific sports teams's seasons and yet this is the one that gets targeted. (This is a clear delete.) --Izno (talk) 14:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, it'd be nice if we could do a big cleanup, and some sort of communication, to better express that this isn't the sort of thing that an encyclopedia documents, so people don't waste their time on writing these things up. Sergecross73 msg me 16:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.