Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Romanian protests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Romanian protests[edit]

2015 Romanian protests (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Either a copycat of Colectiv nightclub fire#Protests, or already copied and pasted there. Regardless, the protests could not be independently notable as it was reaction to one nightclub fire in Romania. I proposed deletion, but someone interfered with "PROD" tag, so I had to completely remove it as it looked already awkward. Now that the protests ended, having a stand-alone copycat seems pointless. George Ho (talk) 06:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But the political impact has widened; plus if we keep this article, we can reduce the scale of the protest section in the fire article, which is becoming unwieldy.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:45, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep - the fallout from this "one nightclub fire in Romania" has been immense and led to the resignation of Victor Ponta, the Prime Minister of Romania, and the mayor of Bucharest. The protests lasted a week and included global media coverage and protests of solidarity in other countries. The Colectiv nightclub fire article is detailed and lengthy and easily stands alone. МандичкаYO 😜 06:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Again, these things were already mentioned there. --George Ho (talk) 07:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Then that section of the article should be trimmed down. I agree it shouldn't be a duplicate, but the protests have the notability for a separate article. The fire, victims, international reaction and investigation info more than fill out the fire article. МандичкаYO 😜 07:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  07:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Wide press coverage. 95.133.216.22 (talk) 11:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is an important event which impacted directly or indirectly millions of people. It's of national and international importance. Alexandrujuncu (talk) 11:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Major deal political moment within national politics; adequately sourced to pass WP:GNG.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.