Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Newcastle sharks attack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:39, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Newcastle sharks attack[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of long term notability. SomeoneNamedDerek (talk) 00:25, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 00:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NOTNEWS Nick-D (talk) 00:59, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete One human injury, no human fatalities. Sharks often attack dolphins. Run-of-the-mill local news. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as above. Neutrality^talk 05:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Slightly better than most of the spate of local articles recently created by this author (and thus at AFD rather than immediately speedied or redirected), but just a relatively minor event of local note. [[WP:NOTNEWS. Meters (talk) 06:17, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the "gallery" is the most ridiculous part; images available in each of the disparate articles brought to together like hieroglyphs or a pictogram. Yes, we understand what a shark attacking a dolphin near Newcastle might look like. St★lwart¹¹¹ 06:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete entirely per Stalwart111 - I've seen some stupid shit in my time but by far that gallery's the most stupidest!, I think we're all well aware of what a shark and dolphin look like!, Anyway back on topic - Clearly fails NOTNEWS. –Davey2010^Talk 08:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:53, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:53, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A clear case of WP:NOTNEWS....William 16:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - snowballing... Witty lama 22:16, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. -- Chuq (talk) 07:58, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No indication of notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 12:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.