Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Kandhamal gang rape case

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for article retention. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Kandhamal gang rape case[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violation of WP:NOTNEWS. That 2008 Kandhamal gang rape seems probably more notable.

The section 2015 Kandhamal gang rape case#Reaction is clearly violating WP:SOAPBOX, with the statements of political and religious entities. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this incident has garnered ongoing, International attention. Bearian (talk) 00:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Case has wide views worldwide and goes deeper roots than just a single incident. PediaAcc (talk) 17:46, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Well sourced and has gathered substantial International coverage.As of this point do think it will meet WP:Lasting.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:26, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.