Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Open de Guadeloupe – Doubles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No prejudice against future merging. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 04:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Open de Guadeloupe – Doubles[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No inline sources, no independent source, no WP:RS found when googling. Article is contrary to WP:NOTSTATS Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:15, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennis-related deletion discussions. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:15, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Caribbean. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Adamtt9 for adding the sources to the victory of the former tournament and the victory of the 2014 tournament. For the other games we still need independent sources.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep looks like a legitimate notable minor league tournament to me. Sources have been added (Thanks Adamtt9) but it could certainly be better. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:28, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – We have had discussions on tournaments like these in the past and it has always been determined that Challenger level tournaments are notable, whether singles or doubles. The only question has ever been whether we need separate articles for the singles and doubles or if we can lump them all into one tournament article overview, but that would be better discussed in an RfC since that might require widespread changes, not in a singular AfD discussion. Adamtt9 (talk) 09:20, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It would be far better to propose a merger (per WP:ATD-M) than deletion for one part of a tournament if you are not going to nominate the deletion of the main article at the same time (In this case 2014 Open de Guadeloupe). Iffy★Chat -- 11:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And while I'm not sure if it's best idea to put all of it on one page, especially for continuity with major league tournaments, at least a merger for a notable minor league tournament makes some sense. It's a single sex event so we could easily fit both the men's singles and doubles draws on the fairly small 2014 Open de Guadeloupe article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.