Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 CONCACAF Girls' U-15 Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 04:15, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 CONCACAF Girls' U-15 Championship

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, with the rationale "clearly notable" provided without any elucidation. Per This discussion and this discussion, consensus is that junior tournaments need to satisfy GNG and are not inherently notable simply because they have been organised by a regional confederation. No indication that this tournament has received the required level of significant, reliable, non-routine coverage to satisfy GNG. Also significant WP:NOTSTATS concerns due to an almost complete lack of sourced prose. Fenix down (talk) 10:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 12:10, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 16:37, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Plenty of media coverage (and more [1][2][3][4][5][6]), so clearly meets WP:GNG. And I think we should consider whether any tournament organised by a continental confederation should be automatically notable. Number 5 7 21:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This is all WP:ROUTINE match reporting that gives little more than squad list and match summaries. For a continental tournament involving multiple international teams, the google search you have provided beings back an exceedingly low number of results. Fenix down (talk) 06:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Did you read the links? This is not a match report, nor is this or this or this or this or this. And even if there were only match reports, the games are being covered by national media in the respective countries, which is a clear sign of notability. I really don't understand your logic. Number 5 7 08:47, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above - Passes GNG .–Davey2010 • (talk) 03:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Completely notable article, and an ongoing sport event. Meets all guidelines, and should not be deleted. Canucksfan97 (talk) 22:58, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per Number 57 and it Passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:20, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.