Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 SAASL Saturday Division 4 League

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No !keep votes for a topic that fails to meet the General notability guideline hence the consensus is to delete.  Philg88 talk 05:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2012 SAASL Saturday Division 4 League[edit]

2012 SAASL Saturday Division 4 League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet notoriety guidelines. J man708 (talk) 08:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page as this too, fails to meet any form of notoriety guidelines and seems to have been created by people directly involved with the league. This is a local amateur sporting league's fourth division. It's hardly worthy of being an article on Wiki:
2014 SAASL Saturday Division 3 League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) J man708 (talk) 08:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Non-notable very low level local amateur league, no indication that this league has garnered any significant coverage whatsoever. Fenix down (talk) 11:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 11:41, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.