Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 MTV Europe Music Awards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 15:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 MTV Europe Music Awards

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Its going to be held in November, too early to start off an article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 09:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was oficially announced by the European MTV.--Spacejam2 (talk) 09:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy Can be userfied untill there is more information available then date and venue. Night of the Big Wind _talk 00:23, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All we know is the venue city, nothing else. We won't know anything more than that until September, so we don't need this article until then. Nate • (chatter) 07:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:CRYSTAL - "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." Lugnuts (talk) 18:44, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -Scottywong | chat _ 15:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Definitely notable and definitely going to occur, so as User:Lugnuts points out above, this is okay with CRYSTAL. Further, there's no speculation here; what is presented is verified. True the page lacks independent RS, but those will be applied as they present themselves. Subjective "too early" is an opinion, and we solve disagreements through consensus measurement. If we delete this, likely somebody else will start the article again in a matter of weeks. If we userfy this, likely somebody else will start the article again in a matter of weeks. I see several reasons to keep in mainspace: 1) every other such event has been deemed notable, 2) the event is unlikely to be cancelled, 3) Wikipedia will soon need such a pagespace as a place to put sources as they appear, 4) 2011 page was created in March. I see no compelling reason to delete. BusterD (talk) 13:15, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.