Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 in music
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 19:17, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2011 in music[edit]
- 2011 in music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball springs to mind here - this only consists of two artists who may return then (without sources), and three who may release albums then: one I don't think mentions 2011 and the other group's news page definitely doesn't mention 2011 either. In any case, isn't September 2009 a little early to start talking about 2011's music? DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 19:37, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As per nom, and fails WP:CRYSTAL. Frmatt (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per nom. B.Rossow talkcontr 19:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow delete per WP:CRYSTAL. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 21:13, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Recreate sometime next year (or whenever there is enough for an article). youngamerican (wtf?) 12:46, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete but come back soon. Mandsford (talk) 14:58, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL/not enough information. Shark96z (talk) 17:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow delete per all the above. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 23:30, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete until more verifiability. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 19:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.