Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Gemini Awards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep – withdrawn by nominator. Non-admin closure. --Lambiam 04:52, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Gemini Awards

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article reads a lot like an advertisement, I think a section in the main article for this awards show would work much better Nathan2055 ^talk^-^review 18:14, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as part of established set of articles on Gemini Awards by year. Same way we've got articles on Emmy Awards by year, etc. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:53, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The lead needs improvement and it needs more links. Basically, it needs to be wikified by someone who knows about those articles. I'll appropriately tag the article. --Nathan2055 ^talk^-^review 20:31, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SNOWBALL Keep. Never should have been brought to AfD. One of a long series of articles about major annual awards in the Canadian television industry. Rewriting the prose along the style of the previous years would have been a better approach for the nominator to take. PK T(alk) 21:53, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Let's go ahead and withdraw this nomination. I didn't know about the other articles before listing the debate. Let this be a lesson to me-never list an article that's part of a successful series. --Nathan2055 ^talk^-^review 22:22, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.