Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Anshun incident (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wifione Message 06:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
:2011 Anshun incident (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
per WP:NOT#NEWS. This is but a news item more suited to Wikinews. There are in excess of 90,000 civil disturbances in China each year, and aside from the news reports already cited, there is little other information and commentary. Nine months on, it's not even remembered. Therefore little indication that there is any long-lasting impact of this incident.Ohconfucius ¡digame! 01:22, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You are just feeding the trend. Instead of looking for more editors, you are yielding to the fact that no one wants to contribute to it. Remember this is severe enough to involve flipping police cars and fighting with police. Even HK macau haven't had a riot of this scale. So how small can this really be? Not as small as you think. Benjwong (talk) 02:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- HK or Macau are developed societies and there are established civic safety valves. There aren't usually any civil disturbances, which would make for a notable event whenever there are any. It's quite different when disturbances number in the thousands. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 06:45, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: non-notable event that has generated minimal news coverage and has no long-term impact. Google news search returns no results except the Wikipedia article being discussed here. --Zanhe (talk) 03:33, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I outline my reasons for deletion over at my previous nomination at deleting this article. Colipon+(Talk) 04:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.