Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 G-20 Summits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was split. Despite the few number of !votes, it is quite clear from the discussion what needs to be done. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 G-20 Summits

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating this page for deletion because G-20 summit articles have not been grouped in the past. This article groups the two Toronto and Seoul summit. The two must have separate articles (the Toronto summit already has its own article). Eelam StyleZ (talk) 00:49, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:06, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think the language and tone can be cleaned a bit, but that's not a deletion issue. For my part, the fact that we haven't had an article of this type before isn't itself a reason to delete, either. I think it would be useful to have a page for the 2010 summits, and to then fork out to each individual summit, if enough happened to justify an article. It could be that this ends up being a useful landing page for further information, similar to a disambiguation page between the 2010 meetings. If the individual meetings are notable, then an article that summarizes them as a group would have merit, as well. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:19, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I beg to differ. This would probably require a merger of 2009 G-20 London summit and 2009 G-20 Pittsburgh summit. Also, if we were to have a common article for summits, that would have to be on the appropriate section on the G-20 major economies article. A common article just for the summits in 2010, I doubt would make any sense--both are most probably going to have different outcomes like the previous summits. Eelam StyleZ (talk) 02:22, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So split them and make this a disambiguation page. No need for deletion. Even if this page was kept, suggesting this means we need to merge the 2009 summits is silly: WP:OTHER. Fences&Windows 17:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split and dabify so each summit is in a separate article. 70.29.210.155 (talk) 05:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.