Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Luquan protest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:36, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Luquan protest

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. No significance. Orphan. Not encyclopedic. Colipon+(Talk) 19:29, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Those last two sentence fragments aren't reasons for deletion, but I agree that this has no lasting significance. DoctorKubla (talk) 08:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is the type of thing that should only be covered if it gets coverage in books and/or journal articles, or if news sources continue covering it years later. Nyttend (talk) 12:24, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.