Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Joy Flight crash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A snowball is rolling here. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Joy Flight crash[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable aviation incident. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 08:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete cant see anything that would make this worthy of a stand-alone article, it would have had to kill somebody important or hit something important to pass the bar as helicopter accidents are unfortunately common and mostly unencyclopedic. MilborneOne (talk) 15:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are a ton of news references that covered these events, including national coverage (WP:GEOSCOPE), but that's just not enough. -- RM 16:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - routine helicopter crash. No need to have an article here. Mjroots (talk) 18:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete News coverage does not notability make!!!--Petebutt (talk) 02:50, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - news reports, then silence. Australia is a country where a Qantas flight turning around and going back to its point of departure will generate news coverage; where every single aircraft crash will get news coverage, even a single-seat ultralight (I discovered a couple of hours ago that the light aircraft crash in Sydney I was involved in, was mentioned in the Singapore Straits Times newspaper). As Petebutt says, "News coverage does not notability make" especially in the Australian context. YSSYguy (talk) 09:33, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Commonplace and not notable. We don't have articles on each individual car accident around the world, why would we have this? - Ahunt (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Most of the information here already appears in the "Incidents" section of Dreamworld. Also, the title of the article is an unlikely search term, so redirecting seems inappropriate. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:09, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Delete as nothing convincing of better independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.