Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 World Finals Odds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close and re-listed as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 World Finals Odds (2nd nomination) due to AFD template never appearing on article page during this AFD. It was also not transcluded into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 October 18 until after closing. Non-admin closure. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2008 World Finals Odds

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a tipsheet Donnie Park (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to be useful for the subject of Monster Jam. -- ISLANDERS27 09:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that we should keep odds for every Grand National races should there be any, my basis for this nomination is that this pointless article serves no purpose for the Monster Jam article, plus Wikipedia is not a tipsheet for betting, plus where is WP:VERIFY. Donnie Park (talk) 23:50, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia isn't a collection of gambling odds. This article is not useful to anyone. Bookmakers odds are always going to vary from each other anyway. --Jimbo^[online] 16:56, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a sports book -Drdisque (talk) 20:57, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pointless article Petepetepetepete (talk) 14:32, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.