Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Shenzhen anti-police riot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 12:47, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Shenzhen anti-police riot[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a news story. It belongs to Wikinews. If it deserves a standalone article here to pass general notability guidelines, then it must display some sort of long-term significance. This event was a one-off thing. It does not have long term significance. The dust has settled on this event three years after it happened and we can say that confidently now. Colipon+(Talk) 01:40, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:23, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 06:03, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOT#NEWS.--70.80.234.163 (talk) 09:58, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The topic is passing WP:GNG per just the current references in the article. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:10, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How many people have to be involved in a riot to make it notable? I read other Chinese riot articles which usually involve something far more substantial than this. [1] says "By 5pm, more than 400 people had gathered at the police detachment with more than 2,000 others watching nearby." It also says its in a city of "more than 8 million people". So that doesn't seem like a lot. It didn't last long, and not a lot happened. Dream Focus 02:16, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the article references long-term consequences, a hallmark of history rather than merely news. Bearian (talk) 19:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.