Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 march snowfall

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete  (aeropagitica)  16:17, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 march snowfall[edit]

A weather report from the Bay Area, California. Not an encyclopedic entry, and never will be. I'm also very worried about the Pokémon effect here. Eivindt@c 20:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not very notable, did not cause any serious or important effects. SCHZMO ✍ 21:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unencyclopedic. Nothing about this snowfall is particularly unique; it's in an area where snow falls regularly during the winter (i.e., it's not a normally-hot and snow-free area), while March is "late in the season", March snowfalls are certainly not rare. —LrdChaos 21:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom and LrdChaos. -- P199 21:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Non-encyclo. Per above. --lightdarkness (talk) 21:37, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per all above. WP:SNOW-related joke withheld. --Kinu t/c 23:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NOR. Royboycrashfan 00:14, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as alluded to in the nomination if we keep this we'll need articles on the friday afternoon it rained in Manitoba and the Sunday morning it was sunny in Seattle and the weather in every place every day. Cool3 01:31, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, original research. --Terence Ong 04:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per all of the above, and a comment: I don't quite know the motivations behind User:Yyyhenry's decision to make yet another snowfall-related article after his first one (2006 San Francisco Bay Area snow event) because neither seem too notable to me. I mean geez, it's just some flurries. It's not like it even caused a state of emergency. Maybe the other one should go up for AfD, too? — Indi [ talk ] 17:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete don't you know, people, we have a clearly policy for this: WP:SNOW. - the.crazy.russian τ/ç/ë 04:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2006_march_snowfall&oldid=1144849912"