Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005 Northern Iowa Panthers football team
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep — nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. MuZemike (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
2005 Northern Iowa Panthers football team[edit]
- 2005 Northern Iowa Panthers football team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Questionable notability for this single season of a college football team. raven1977 (talk) 15:27, 20 October 2008 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn, see comment below. raven1977 (talk) 21:05, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. —raven1977 (talk) 15:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep relevance of single season articles of college football is discussed at the essay WP:CFBSEASON. And if that isn't enough, they ended up #2 in Division I-AA.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Needs some cleanup and sourcing, but the Panthers play at the highest level of college sports, Division I, and the 2005 team was runner up for the NCAA Division I Football Championship. --Geologik (talk) 17:16, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Could use fleshing out, but nothing wrong here. If we're not careful, there could be odd consequences...i.e. check out these two FAs: 2007 USC Trojans football team and 2005 Texas Longhorn football team. --Bobak (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Geologik. JKBrooks85 (talk) 20:48, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I was unaware of the notability essay for College Football season articles; I was unsure where to look, so I just glanced through the general notability guidelines. But now I see there's a good guideline for this, which this article does meet, so thank you to those above, for the information. I wish to withdraw my nomination. raven1977 (talk) 21:04, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.