Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000 Nottingham Open – Singles
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. A valid rationale for deletion relative to Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Deletion policy is not present. For example, per WP:NEXIST, notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid rationales. North America1000 13:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2000 Nottingham Open – Singles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
0 sources. Kind regards, JJK2000 (talk) 03:17, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennis-related deletion discussions. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep 10 minutes in Google found a whole bunch of newspaper sources. Also, can we please stop using AFD as a high stakes source request tool? Iffy★Chat -- 09:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.