Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20's Plenty for Us

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 30 km/h zone. Content can be merged from history if it is sourceable. Sandstein 16:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

20's Plenty for Us[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable article, no references. A bit of googling around shows mostly fliers, powerpoints, and mentions. Nothing that really shows notability. The prose of the article is unencyclopedic, as well as possibly promotional. _{Vermont | reply here} 13:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:11, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:11, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Partly promotional, partly attack page, almost no good sources. Also, there's not much chance of good sources, as press coverage tends to be of campaigning, normally joint with other road safety groups, rather than of the organization itself. (My CoI declaration; I'm a member of 20's Plenty and a local rep.) Richard Keatinge (talk) 14:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. Non notable organisation, unsourced and completely fails WP:NPOV. Ajf773 (talk) 18:40, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's an unsourceable bunch of rabid Daily Mail readers. Get rid. (I am disappointed I cannot set off a 20mph speed camera on my pushbike). Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:43, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection, would it perhaps be better as a redirect to 30 km/h zone? With mild boldness, I've replaced the content with the redirect code, while leaving the AfD notice. Richard Keatinge (talk) 13:33, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yep that seems like a shout: Merge with 30 km/h zone!--Newbiepedian (talk · contribs · X! · logs) 05:31, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree the article is badly written, but I'm finding lots of coverage of the campaigns. In rough order of quality of sources:
The ones lower down on the list are mostly coverage in local media, but higher up are articles in publications on this side of the pond, which shows more than local interest. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:04, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As an alternative, a merge to 30 km/h zone would be reasonable as well. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:59, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.