Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1st Special Forces Brigade (South Korea)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. FYI: A fuller deletion rationale providing policy reasons why an article should be deleted would be more persuasive than just stating that this article had been PROD'd and de-PROD'd. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1st Special Forces Brigade (South Korea)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Removed Prod. Blethering Scot 15:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Blethering Scot 15:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please use search term "제1공수특전여단". 1st Special Forces Brigade meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organizations. Footwiks (talk) 16:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, The Brigade has a lot of sources in korean related with its military achievements. The sources Jungang ilbo and Gukbangilbo(Defense times) are notable newspapers in South korea, with Gukbang Ilbo specializing in Defense technology matters. Even if the sources are not in english, it definitely fits into the category of significant coverage for said brigade, as it addresses the brigade in different news outlets. Waltzingmogumogupeach (talk) 16:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now, this article meets the criteria of WP:N and the sources are ok but it needs to be further expanded. If the creator of the article does not expand it for several months, then it should be merged into the Republic of Korea Army. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 20:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. PROD reason was "Article does not prove notability with independent sources." Ample independent sources have now been provided. Whether the sources are in Korean or English does not matter. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:40, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The nominator apparently can't be bothered to provide any rationale for deletion (not even repeating the prod rationale). Brigades are clearly notable and there are enough sources to prove this one's notability in any case. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.