Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1oT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1oT[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Present sources are mostly press releases and/or unreliable websites. The only one that appears reliable is Postimees, which may or may not meet WP:CORPDEPTH, but is in any case not enough on its own. WP:BEFORE did not locate sources that would ameliorate this. Pinging User:Kvng as remover of PROD. -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 20:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Computing. -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 20:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Estonia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found no mainstream news coverage. Owen× ☎ 00:24, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per the nomination. Ratnahastin (talk) 13:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Thanks for reviewing the existing sources. I have also reviewed them now and agree that they don't meet WP:CORPDEPTH. ~Kvng (talk) 16:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.