Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1PS (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1PS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, and article has no third-party reliable sources. Random86 (talk) 00:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. One digital single was released nearly a year ago. In kpop time, that's an eternity; the lack of subsequent releases does not bode well for this group. Despite a few articles in typical Korean gossip media (who report on anyone who merely exists), I don't really think this group passes notability requirements. This is too soon; if they release a physical single or album it can be reconsidered. Shinyang-i (talk) 23:55, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unnotable Asdklf; (talk) 02:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.