Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1996–97 United States network television schedule (Saturday morning)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1996–97 United States network television schedule (Saturday morning)[edit]

1996–97 United States network television schedule (Saturday morning) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

How does this topic meet WP:NOTABILITY? Has been unsourced for 12 years and other sites I could find with this information were wikis/mirror sites. Taking to AfD rather than prod as is part of a series. Boleyn (talk) 06:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:19, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:19, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as well as the articles for all other years. I find it hard to believe how it has already survived three AfD's: [1] [2] and [3] but absolutely nothing has been done to provide reliable sources, nor any indication of notability, historical significance or importance backed up by secondary sources. This is considering the first AfD was in the 2007 so there has been at least eleven (twelve according to Boleyn) years for somebody to sort this out. So many of the 'keep' arguments appear to be emotionally charged WP:ILIKEIT votes and through so much undue weight which led to them being kept by consensus. But the policies on notability and verifibility are very clear so in my opinion if the articles cannot be sourced they should all be removed from Wikipedia or transferred to another more suitable Wiki. Ajf773 (talk) 09:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.