Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1974 Ethiopian coup d'état

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Singularity42 (talk) 21:58, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1974 Ethiopian coup d'état[edit]

1974 Ethiopian coup d'état (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed WP:BLAR. Article is an unattributed copy-paste from Ethiopian Civil War#History. I thought a redirect made sense. Article creator reverted without explanation. As per WP:BLAR, AfD is an appropriate forum to resolve this dispute. Singularity42 (talk) 19:59, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: The article can be expanded to further paragraph and I willingly do it as soon as possible. I'm not agreed to merge in the Ethiopian Civil War as it is standalone coup d'état and no need to insert infobox there twice per MoS. For copyright reasons, I would like to trim contents and write in my own with copyediting. The Supermind (talk) 20:10, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This is the version of the target page when the redirect was made, prior to Supermind's changes: [1]. Singularity42 (talk) 20:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There are a lot of sources that detail about the coup d'état such as in JSTOR and Google Book. AfD should considerate to this issue but please give me a time to develop it or incubate to draft space rather than speedy deleted? The Supermind (talk) 20:25, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The AfD generally runs a minimum of 7 days. Do you want to just draftify it for now and I'll withdraw my AfD nomination? Partly my bad - I should have run this option by you before this AfD nom. Singularity42 (talk) 20:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I want to draftify, I'll develop it there. Thank you for your understanding. The Supermind (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.