Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1954 Kukarkin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:48, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1954 Kukarkin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 16:54, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, deletion is not an option per NASTRO. It is either keep or re-direct. -- Kheider (talk) 15:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

redir to list. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It has a long rotation period of 136 hours. -- Kheider (talk) 15:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. In this case I think only having one study on this object [1] is (barely) sufficient, because it identifies an unusual property of the object, its slow rotation. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:30, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.