Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1922 Howard Bison football team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Withdrawn by nominator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1922 Howard Bison football team

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG nor does it meet SNG. Per WP:CFBSEASON "Single seasons can be considered notable. In this case the season must receive substantial non-routine coverage". The only source seems to be from the school itself. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; I have expanded the article with improved sourcing that shows substantial non-routine coverage. Nominated didn't do a WP:BEFORE. Jweiss11 (talk) 02:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article lacked any independent sourcing at the time of the nomination (see here), but with the WP:SIGCOV added by Jweiss, this passes the WP:GNG standard. Given the improvement, perhaps the nominator will now withdraw the nom. Cbl62 (talk) 03:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator While I couldn't originally find non routine coverage or many sources (and I did look) several people have worked hard to find those sources where I couldn't. I am new to this and will make sure to include more details about my serach before nominating to ensure there isn't confusion around wether or not I looked. IntentionallyDense (talk) 05:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets WP:GNG, per the sources added to the article by Jweiss11. Ejgreen77 (talk) 11:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.