Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1893 De La Salle Institute football team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 21:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1893 De La Salle Institute football team

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article concerns a high school American football team. The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NSEASON. Moreover, we appropriately discourage articles about high school football seasons, and while an exception might be appropriate in an extraordinary case, this is not such a case. Finally, per WP:NOTINHERITED, playing a game against Notre Dame (a program that was in its infancy in 1893) is not a basis for notability. Cbl62 (talk) 03:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Cbl62 (talk) 03:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC) [reply]

~~Keep~~ I'm good with this one actually, but I'll probably end up being on the short end of the stick. I'm not particularly enthusiastic and would agree to a redirect of some type.--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the season itself isn't notable, just a couple routine game blurbs, no WP:GNG. Just because a team played Notre Dame doesn't make their season notable. If there's a requisite Notre Dame season article some of the information can be moved there, or to any De La Salle article we might have. SportingFlyer T·C 04:17, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to article on De La Salle Institute, we struggle enough to have well sourced information on high schools, we do not need to split of sub-articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:13, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per SportingFlyer. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 00:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to Delete because in this case WP:RELISTINGISEVIL. Consensus is clear and there was no reason to relist. (Thanks, though!)--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.