Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1890 Konoshenkova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Davewild (talk) 07:32, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1890 Konoshenkova[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 16:51, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

tentative keep - This article exists in 20+ Wikipedias which makes me quite hesitant to vote delete. I found some that refer about who it was named for and that it goes around the earth every 5 years or so. How much does it need to establish notability? Elgatodegato (talk) 22:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
redir to list. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:19, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per WP:NASTRO (WP:NASTCRIT) No significant coverage found on this object itself. Everything on google scholar is a paper listing several asteroids (explicitly mentioned in NASTCRIT #3 as not meeting notability) or otherwise failing to provide significant commentary on the object. ― Padenton|✉ 21:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect' per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources available to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 16:16, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.