Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1847 Stobbe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to [[]]. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1847 Stobbe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 08:56, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak redirect. Thiele's 1000'th asteroid [1] but I don't see a lot of significance in that milestone. And part of a 1974 close encounter with 511 Davida that could help determine that larger asteroid's mass [2] but I think that's more about Davida than this one. Other than that I found one lightcurve study [3] but I still think it's a bit short of the bar for notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient reliable sources available to build an article of decent length. It fails WP:GNG. Praemonitus (talk) 20:28, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.