Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1829 Dawson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 04:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1829 Dawson[edit]

1829 Dawson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. Should be deleted and redirected to the list article, List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Boleyn (talk) 18:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 18:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: I found a pair of light curve studies and a few mentions in other journal articles, so this seems like a borderline keep. Praemonitus (talk) 20:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per WP:NASTRO (WP:NASTCRIT) No significant coverage found on this object itself. Everything on google scholar is a paper listing several asteroids (explicitly mentioned in NASTCRIT #3 as not meeting notability) ― Padenton|   21:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.