Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1828 Kashirina
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 00:34, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- 1828 Kashirina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet N:ASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted / redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. As the number is under 2000, needs not to be done unilaterally per previous discussions, so taking to AfD rather than bold redirect or prod. Boleyn (talk) 07:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 07:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect. Mentioned in a 32-asteroid lightcurve study [1] and an 820-asteroid spectral study [2]. Not enough individual attention to warrant keeping. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources available to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 22:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.