Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/17509 Ikumadan
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 17001–18000. North America1000 02:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- 17509 Ikumadan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Delete / redirect per NASTRO to List of minor planets: 17001–18000. Boleyn (talk) 07:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 07:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:46, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉ 14:59, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Just one light curve study.[1] Praemonitus (talk) 17:30, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect. Nothing of interest found on Google scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: If we redirect, can we move all the infobox information into the list? Can that be done in an automated process for all in the 1000 range? I am thinking of how to best compile information for readers.--Milowent • hasspoken 15:23, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.