Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1733 Silke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to [[]]. Redirect is usually preferred over deletion. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1733 Silke

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be redirected; or (preferably) redirected, as per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 19:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Praemonitus (talk) 20:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources found to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 20:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of how this meets WP:NASTRO. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Nothing of interest found on Google scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.