Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1679 Nevanlinna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:02, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1679 Nevanlinna[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 21:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. Fails per WP:SCIENCE. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 22:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak redirect. I found two lightcurve studies (one a re-analysis of previous data) [1] [2]. That's not quite enough for notability for me, but close. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:20, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.