Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1412 Lagrula
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. North America1000 17:50, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- 1412 Lagrula (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 16:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- redir to list. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:18, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- Weak keep. It's both the subject of a single-object study [1] and of some historical interest as part of early discoveries of asteroid groups with closely related orbits [2]. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.