Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1347 in philosophy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to ~~14th century philosophy~~ 14th century in philosophy due to naming conventions and redirect avoidance. (non-admin closure) — Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:28, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1347 in philosophy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG failing list with 1 entry. » Shadowowl | talk 16:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Shadowowl: I think you could perhaps try to combine all these "Year in philosophy" lists with only one entry into larger lists, i.e. something like combining 1007 in philosophy, 1073 in philosophy, and 1079 in philosophy into 11th century in philosophy or a similar title? ^Semi_Hypercube ✎ 16:31, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That might be a good idea. The point is that some user created these pages for random years, and that you might have to search a lot for the others who were not born in the years randomly picked by some user. » Shadowowl | talk 16:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 19:07, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion would violate WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE and WP:R because we could merge and redirect to Medieval philosophy. Alternatively we could apply WP:POKEMON and combine these year articles into century articles: the centuries in philosophy will be notable due to things like this. No comment on notability at this time. James500 (talk) 06:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (all year articles in range) to 14th century philosophy. The per-year articles (all of them) are at the present too sparse to be of use.Icewhiz (talk) 08:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Icewhiz. ^Semi_Hypercube ✎ 18:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Icewhiz. Even 14th century philosophy is likely to be a very small category. It may need merging to the year category. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:46, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.