Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1333 Cevenola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 07:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1333 Cevenola[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Delete / redirect per NASTRO to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Boleyn (talk) 19:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 19:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It has a spectral study and a light curve, as well as being mentioned as a candidate binary in several other papers. At least a weak keep. Praemonitus (talk) 20:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Praemonitus (talk) 20:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Two papers with this object in their title [1] [2] and several more with it in their abstracts [3] [4] [5], and the suggestion that it is a binary, push it above threshold for me. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.