Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/129234 Silly
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 129001–130000#201. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 129234 Silly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a procedural nomination. The article was tagged for notability concerns by this nominator. It was immediately PROD'd, then changed to a redirect. The redirect was reverted back to the original form with no tags with the statement "notability disputes about named asteroids are SO 2008". More Wikipedia goofiness to be sure. I've attempted to find sufficient sources but concluded that this asteroid does not currently satisfy the notability recommendations listed at WP:NASTRO. Hence, my preference is a redirect. I'm posting here for discussion because of the removal of the PROD and the notability tags. If somebody wanted to write an article about the French optician and amateur astronomer Didier Silly,[1] it could be mentioned there. But I suspect he would be just as non-notable. RJH (talk) 05:26, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Restore redirect. "Notability disputes about named asteroids..." are referred to WP:NASTRO, which clearly says this object is utterly non-notable. - The Bushranger One ping only 07:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Restore redirect. Made a good-faith effort to find supporting material, and came up empty handed regarding the kind of sourcing required by WP:NASTRO. AstroCog (talk) 03:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.