Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1228 Scabiosa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1228 Scabiosa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted; or redirected per NASTRO to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 06:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. Its name has a mildly amusing history (it's a plant genus, but part of a sequence of asteroid names whose initials spell out the name of an astronomer who didn't want to be the namesake of an asteroid) [1] but I don't think that's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per WP:DWMP: unable to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 20:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.