Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/11:11 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. —Cleared as filed. 00:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

11:11[edit]

Article was nominated for deletion about 8 months ago and was deleted. Someone recreated it. Delete with extreme prejudice. TheRingess 18:11, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, time/number verifiably considered to have mystical power [1] Kappa 19:17, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I thought it was 11:34, but it's a good article anyway. Ashibaka tock 20:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong KeepNotable. Interesting article. Might need a rewrite though. Englishrose 23:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I hate voting to keep, as this topic is clearly rubbish, and calls of "NPOV" will prevent the article from ever truly reflecting that. But the Uri Geller and IMDB links seem to prove at least some notability. Article needs cleanup and balance from a skeptic, but perhaps not a delete. Vslashg 00:49, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, original research. User:Zoe|^(talk) 01:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rewrite Thomas 20:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the link provided by Kappa CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 02:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep... interesting phenomenon. New movie will relate to it. Verify accuracy, though. Calwatch 05:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I wrote this article purely because I came across the topic several times on the Internet and figured it was notable, rubbish or not. -ryan-d 15:15, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Notable. Bleedstupid 14:44, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as recreation of deleted material. Failing that, delete as completely idiosyncratic non-notable non-topic. Ikkyu2 22:39, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.